Originally Posted by
EeL
I've seen most of them and I would have to say those are the only near-good/good ones. Three of them utilizing superior superstars(Edge, HBK and HHH) and those being the only good ones, while the Lashley and Khali ones were trash IMO(though Cena did a better job with Khali than Batista) and the Cena vs Umaga matches were better than the Lashley vs Umaga ones mainly I guess because they were flooded with McMahons/bad stipulations on the side. The HBK vs Cena at WM23 was good only because of HBK but the one the night after was one of the best matches I have ever seen. I know Cena has had "some" good matches but why should a person who only has "some" good matches be so hyped and praised by being WWE Champion for more than a year while others who continually put on good matches are not? Trust me, if Cena were given like an extra year or so in mid-card before going ME I would probably like him more and he'd probably have been able to hone his wrestling skills.