I understand that it's unrealistic to ask them to cut down there PPV's back to 6 or 7, which is how many there should realisticly be, but shouldn't they cut it down to 1 a month, the reason there's so many right now is because it was brand-only PPV's and it wouldn't have to be so rushed as all brands, it still is rushed with 12, but it wouldn't be as bad if they only took away 3 PPV's and overall be a good buisness move, thoughts.
Results 1 to 4 of 4
-
05-24-2007, 08:31 PM #1Legend In My Spare Time
- Join Date
- Jun 2006
- Location
- The "Winners" Circle
- Posts
- 3,818
- Rep Power
- 18649
Does the WWE need to cut down there PPV's just a little
-
05-24-2007, 08:42 PM #2Mr. Kennedy...KENNEDY!
- Join Date
- Mar 2007
- Posts
- 14
- Rep Power
- 19
15 Pay Per Views a year..
some times 2 ppv's in a month or 3 if you watch TNA
i think 12 would be better if you had to pay for it
anyway not bothered to much as i download it all for free here at uow
prolly be boring knowing in the main event their wont be a new champion though
-
05-24-2007, 11:23 PM #3Resident Cena Fan
- Join Date
- Jan 2007
- Location
- FL
- Posts
- 1,581
- Rep Power
- 84
As long as they make money, they won't fix it...that's why I download them...so they'll fix it...
[SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
-
05-25-2007, 10:24 PM #4On the bench!
- Join Date
- Apr 2007
- Location
- Manchester, England
- Posts
- 28
- Rep Power
- 0
With 2 weeks between Judgment Day and One Night Stand, it seems obvious to me that they should cut a few PPVs from the schedule as soon as possible.
It makes sense, they added more PPVs because they were brand exclusive, now they are tri-branded they need to take some out again. They leave themselves very little time to build the matches.
Reply With Quote
