I saw the last 20 seconds of RAW (after TNA ended). The rest of the time I was glued to Spike tv. I thought it was a pretty good show overall. Quite a few gliches, quite a promo errors but hey, it was a great start.
I saw the last 20 seconds of RAW (after TNA ended). The rest of the time I was glued to Spike tv. I thought it was a pretty good show overall. Quite a few gliches, quite a promo errors but hey, it was a great start.
^Proof that I'm Kurt's #1 Fan! He said so himself!:tehe:
i love ur like omg tna got a 2.2 yay when raw got a 5.5, WWE blew TNA out the water and raw averages a 3.3 how can TNA run monday nights
Who are you talking to? Me? Try using quotes next time. Where are you getting 5.5? The show finished with a peak of 3.6. So they didn't even break a 4.0 like WWE officials expected. While TNA, only being 8 years old, being up against RAW, received their highest rating ever, a 1.5. So if going against the competition garners them more attention and ratings, why not do it again. It makes sense. So what's your problem?:punish:
^Proof that I'm Kurt's #1 Fan! He said so himself!:tehe:
yaY UR HIGHEST rating ever a 1.5 wow good for you, thats not touching raws numbers at all, if anything tna's numbers are gonna go down. basically being a tna fan is like competing in the special olympics at the end of the day ur still retarded
Lets see now. TNA was on for 3 hours. RAW was on for 2 hours. RAW receives a little over 3 million more viewers that TNA. You do do the math.
TNA put on an awesome show... I am impressed they got their highest ratings yet whilst going head to head with RAW, that is a good start for TNA.
RAW was horrendous, and I think their ratings would have beel lower, if it had not been for Vince promising to put one heck of a show on, so everyone tunes in for it, only to be disappointed, with the only highlight being to see Bret again.