Welcome to Universe of Wrestling Forums! Established in 2006!

We hope you enjoy your visits.

To get the full benefits of UOW, please register. It is quick and easy.

Benefits include:
- You can do a lot more on forums than social media sites. - Member only forums.
- Friendly members and staff.
- You lose this welcome at the top of the screen every page.
- A chatbox where you can chat in real time about wrestling or anything else.

A lot more to come as UOW is changing this year.

Click here to register!

Page 2 of 5 FirstFirst 1234 ... LastLast
Results 11 to 20 of 42
  1. #11
    The Mac
    Guest

    Default

    no it doesnt matter if its a individual or team sport
    comparing tiger woods who walks around hittin a little white ball
    to farve who has to dodge 300 lb guys is stupid
    and u really think he has talent recevers compared to other teams
    the viking's recievers r way below standard they got one star in rice
    but the rest arent very good escpecially compared to other top teams
    maybe u should check ur facts before making comments

  2. #12
    On the bench!
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Location
    NE OH USA
    Posts
    447
    Rep Power
    0

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by macmichaud2 View Post
    no it doesnt matter if its a individual or team sport
    comparing tiger woods who walks around hittin a little white ball
    to farve who has to dodge 300 lb guys is stupid
    and u really think he has talent recevers compared to other teams
    the viking's recievers r way below standard they got one star in rice
    but the rest arent very good escpecially compared to other top teams
    maybe u should check ur facts before making comments
    It does matter. If a golfer sucks, you know right away. If a QB sucks, his receivers & other backs can work to help cover it. That is what Favre's are doing.

    Maybe you should check your facts... Or admit neither of us are stating any (outside of the team-vs.-individual fact); They're just opinions.

  3. #13
    The Mac
    Guest

    Default

    i've been checkin facts unlike u
    but yes eveyone is entitled to their own opinions
    but saying im pretending to not get what ur talking about
    just so i dont have to counter it makes me mad and sorry but the quarterback
    is the most individual part of the team game if the QB struggles it dont matter how good ur recievers are

  4. #14
    On the bench!
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Location
    NE OH USA
    Posts
    447
    Rep Power
    0

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by macmichaud2 View Post
    i've been checkin facts unlike u
    but yes eveyone is entitled to their own opinions
    but saying im pretending to not get what ur talking about
    just so i dont have to counter it makes me mad and sorry but the quarterback
    is the most individual part of the team game if the QB struggles it dont matter how good ur recievers are
    You haven't been checking facts. Otherwise, you'd state some.

    I'm sorry if what I say makes you mad. Maybe it wouldn't if you admit it. The only people who don't admit QBs' problems can be covered by teammates are coaches with bad ones, & QBs with egos. Which are you?

  5. #15
    The Mac
    Guest

    Default

    ur full of it
    all ive been doing is naming facts and stats
    proving farves greatness
    and only complete tools or retards cant understand how stats prove facts
    which are you?

  6. #16
    On the bench!
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Location
    NE OH USA
    Posts
    447
    Rep Power
    0

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by macmichaud2 View Post
    ur full of it
    all ive been doing is naming facts and stats
    proving farves greatness
    and only complete tools or retards cant understand how stats prove facts
    which are you?
    I could tell you what I am, but you still couldn't prove it. I say that as a fact. The proof for that fact is what you've posted thus far, showing that you can't tell the difference between facts & opinions.

    I understand how stats prove facts; You're the "tool" or "retard" who can't understand you haven't stated any facts.

    Since you like to use those words, I (perhaps incorrectly) will assume you know what they mean, & ask you to tell me which you are.

  7. #17
    The Mac
    Guest

    Default

    dude the stats ive been giving u
    if u were smart enough to understand what they mean
    prove the FACT that farve had a great year last season and should comeback
    and only a complete idiot decides to attack a persons character or Intelligence
    because they r being proven wrong ur not worth my time to argue with on this topic

  8. #18
    On the bench!
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Location
    NE OH USA
    Posts
    447
    Rep Power
    0

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by macmichaud2 View Post
    dude the stats ive been giving u
    if u were smart enough to understand what they mean
    prove the FACT that farve had a great year last season and should comeback
    and only a complete idiot decides to attack a persons character or Intelligence
    because they r being proven wrong ur not worth my time to argue with on this topic
    I understand what many facts mean. It is you who doesn't understand you have given me none. I on the other hand gave you a statement of fact, & you acted like you didn't understand it, which is either the truth (proving your lower intelligence) or simply a way to deny a fact. (Which seems ironic coming from someone who claims to be the one stating facts.)

    He had a great year last year, but that was largely due to his teammates also being decent, if not above.

    I'm "not worth your time"? I understand; It takes a lot of work to act like you can out "argue" me on this.

  9. #19
    The Mac
    Guest

    Default

    comparing tiger to farve is stupid ya if tiger screws up u can tell cuz he is in the woods
    but if farve screws up u can tell by his interception total and incompletions. he had high interception totals
    for most of his career with much better recievers in the past... the fact that u cant get over ur ego and admit
    farve's accuracy has improved makes u look like a uninformed neanderthal who keeps stating the same thing over and over
    forget about tiger woods already it proves nothing but ur stupidity

  10. #20
    On the bench!
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Location
    NE OH USA
    Posts
    447
    Rep Power
    0

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by macmichaud2 View Post
    comparing tiger to farve is stupid ya if tiger screws up u can tell cuz he is in the woods
    but if farve screws up u can tell by his interception total and incompletions. he had high interception totals
    for most of his career with much better recievers in the past... the fact that u cant get over ur ego and admit
    farve's accuracy has improved makes u look like a uninformed neanderthal who keeps stating the same thing over and over
    forget about tiger woods already it proves nothing but ur stupidity
    The ability to tell if Tiger screws up has less to do with the fact of where he is than the fact he is working solo. On the other hand, Favre is playing with receivers & back that can catch the balls if he throws them well or not. His end-of-year totals do not tell you how many balls he threw where the teammates where & how many they got to that he threw badly.

    The fact that you keep claiming everything you say is fact, in addition to not understanding/admitting what I say (instead blaming it on ego/stupidity) simply proves your stupidity.

    Might I suggest you cease using words like "neanderthal", as understanding them is obviously beyond your intelligence (being they have more than 2 letters).

Page 2 of 5 FirstFirst 1234 ... LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •