PDA

View Full Version : Update On Why Tony Mamaluke & Sylvester Terkay Were Fired



AFC1986
02-02-2007, 11:45 AM
Source: The Wrestling Observer Newsletter

Tony Mamaluke was released because Vince McMahon thought he was too small (he's 5-10 and 155 pounds). ECW writer Dave Lagana fought hard for Tony Mamaluke to keep his job, but in the end, McMahon won out. Lagana came up with an idea of pushing him as an underdog character similar to Sean Waltman as the 1-2-3 Kid, but McMahon didn't go for it and he was subsequently released.

WWE had high expectations for Sylvester Terkay because he was being groomed to feud with The Undertaker in a headline program on SmackDown. But after a few weeks, WWE didn't think his MMA style in the ring was getting over and they wanted him do a pro wrestling oriented style. He was lost with the new style and was subsequently sent to ECW. Also, Gerald Brisco, who loves amateur wrestlers, wanted to make him into a Kurt Angle-style wrestler. He too gave up on him in the end and that led to Terkay being dropped. Terkay's pro wrestling career seems to be over because he is now looking to sign a multi-fight contract with one of the MMA organizations.

wwe9112
02-02-2007, 01:11 PM
thank afc for the info y is vince FIRING so many people

XXKSXX
02-02-2007, 02:20 PM
^ because Vince can fire who ever he wants when he wants :)

I never really liked that Terkay guy was kinda boring to me.

Will
02-02-2007, 08:19 PM
Terkay is as bad at MMA as he was at professional wrestling so he doesn't have any chance of signing with the UFC or Pride, maybe a small organization like KOTC will pick him up.

scorpionf
02-03-2007, 10:54 AM
... And I thought Vince was firing heaps of people cause he has to be able to pay all those bimbos WWE recently hired!

Thank heavens Terkay is gone, he was such a snore!

bballkid102003
02-06-2007, 04:49 AM
Terkay Sucked