If Randy is returning to Legend Killer gimmick...shouldn't he claim Angle as a victim

I've never understood why wrestlers never refer to other wrestlers who've retired or left the federation. It seems lame that fans get used to seeing wrestlers perform and fans are the first to know when a wrestler leaves or retires. It seems idiotic to ACT like that wrestler never existed or competed.

Specifically, Randy Orton had the last feud with Angle before he left. It was a terrible feud, for sure, because it was one of those "throw togethers" to fill out a PPV. There wasn't any "story" behind the Angle/Orton feud. Randy sure cut some of his worst promos ever for that series of matches.

In all honestly, Randy Orton really never left the Legend Killer gimmick. It has just has seemed like that because he hasn't been put in a feuds like that for a few months now due to the problems been put through but now that he's going back on track, I'm sure we'll see it happen sooner rather then later.

Plus, I think the Legend Killer gimmick will be this gimmick for his whole career regardless of him not doing it as often as he did when he first was starting out.

Two reasons:

1. He hasn't listed his downed opponents...so why would he mention Kurt?
2. Why would WWE give Kurt the status of "Legend" when he left them? It's in their best interest to talk crap about Kurt if they ever mention him, not say he was a legend.

wwe is afraid that if they acknowledge somebody like kurt that tna will take away his money lol

No reason at all to mention angle since hes gone.its just bad business to promote a guy that left them.