UEFA declines another venture into the unknown

European football's governing UEFA declined the chance of another venture into the unknown when it chose France ahead of Turkey as hosts of Euro 2016.

In doing so, UEFA broke the recent trend of taking major sporting events to venues considered adventurous.

The decision was seen as a safe bet after delays and problems in Euro 2012 hosts Poland and Ukraine and worries over slow progress in Brazil, who are staging the 2014 World Cup.

"France was maybe the safer option because a lot of things are already there, in Turkey a lot of things would have had to be done with all the commitments and guarantees," UEFA general secretary Gianni Infantino told Reuters.

However, he played down similarities between Euro 2012 and Turkey's 2016 bid after the French won the final round of voting 7-6 on Friday.

"The bid of Turkey was different to the situation we are experiencing in Poland and Ukraine. If you look at the last few years in Turkey and you look at the future potential development... I don't think this had played a major role."

He added: "You can't say what really made the difference, we had really three extremely strong bids."

UEFA executive committee member Theo Zwanziger said France had the benefit of having staged big tournaments in the past, most recently the 1998 World Cup.

"With 24 teams for the first time, I think the executive committee wanted to choose a host for 2016 which had already shown that it could stage a big tournament," Zwanziger told Reuters.

"It's a big challenge. We've seen how difficult it is in a country like Ukraine to turn hopes and wishes into reality and that could have given France the impact."

He added: There was a huge respect among my colleagues for the Turkish bid. I hope the Turkish federation doesn't see this decision as being directed against them."

"I hope they will bid again as the infrastructure in Turkey is growing."