Printable View
I've been watching some old WWE PPV's from 2002-2004 and I gotta say that the product was a whole lot different. Offcourse I know things have changed, but with a brandbased PPV, you get more superstars on a PPV that normally wouldn't fit into a PPV card. Evan Bourne & William Regal to mention a couple of names.
What do you guys think?
I agree and it has more time to build up feuds I think right?
^^ Yeah, each brand had 2 months before a PPV, except for Royal Rumble, Wrestlemania, Summerslam and Survivor Series.
The Bragging Rights PPV would make more sense as well
Yeah then I am all for it! I say either go all out and combine the brands or do a complete redo of it all and actually make a difference between the brands. Maybe making Smackdown more lightweight child like wrestling, and Raw more adultish, and little more riskier. Make them more so of two different companies so that the brand wars make better sense and more entertaining and can get all the age groups in on it. If that makes sense.Quote:
Originally Posted by Smartmark
I just the Brand thing to end already.
^^ A good idea would be to bring back the brandbased PPV's for one year, then end the whole thing at Bragging Rights, with the winning brand becoming the only brand in WWE
If WWE keeps falling through the tubes, i bet we will see that by 2013.Quote:
Originally Posted by Smartmark
^6you do realise the world is ending in 2012 :shifty:
As for brand based shows I seriously doubt if they'll draw. SmackDown is nothing great, even the house shows don't draw for Sd and they have the B-guys at most. WWE will need to rebuild SD before they do this
No one knows day and time, and yeah I said that they should completely redo it i believe, or something along those lines.Quote:
Originally Posted by Kenpachi Zaraki