-
They are both very talented mic workers and also very talented in the ring from what I can see, the problem is they are both just not being used right at the moment, the whole Taker vs Kennedy feud was just a bad feud because of the way they made Kennedy win.
Orton is just as overrated because they are making him so cocky and making him act like he's larger then life, and like someone said they are pushing him down his throat, I agree Orton was great in evolution even when he won the title, but now they are just using him the wrong way.
-
I'd have to say Orton is overrated. But it's though because both guys are so damn good.
-
I think these two are the future, they are fresh and they have that "look" that the WWE have built their great periods on:
Hulk hogan - Golden period
Stone cold - attitude period.
What I am trying to say is that orton and kennedey both have that unique "look" about them to carry the WWE into the next great "period"
-
im gonna have to go with kennedy compared to orton hes nothing
-
-
So if Hogan was the Golden Period and Austin was the Attitude Period, will that make Orton/Keenedy the Cocky Period?
-
orton, to full of himself
-
Both guys have loads of talent and have the potential to be carrying the company in the next few years
-
Kennedy is definately overated. Orton at least has a marketable persona, skills and the ability to make you believe in his matches. Kennedy is getting a push because of the lack of talent on Smackdown. That is not to say that the guys on Smackdown can't wrestle or don't deserve a shot, it is just the view that I am getting from the midcarding that is going on at the moment.
-
There both stars. Neither of them are overrated.
