Welcome to Universe of Wrestling Forums! Established in 2006!

Universe of Wrestling's 20th anniversary is next year and many changes are coming.
Universe of Wrestling is going through a transitional phase right now in 2025.

To become a UOW member, please *Click Here* to register. Quick and easy.

Benefits of becoming a member include:
- You lose this welcome at the top of the screen every page.
- You can do a lot more on forums than social media sites.
- Chat in real time, in our chat box.
- See what members are online.
- Friendly members and staff.
- More benefits coming soon.


Due to the transitional phase, if you get any type of Error Page.
Just refresh the page or click the browser back button or load UOW again.
We apologize for any trouble you may have on the forum during this time.

If you have any questions or need help, please message us on our Facebook page. Click below.
https://www.facebook.com/UniverseOfWrestling/

Results 1 to 2 of 2
  1. #1
    GOD OF THUNDER Kemo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    Tennessee
    Posts
    62,845
    Rep Power
    4535

    Angry Anthem Responds To Jeff Jarrett’s Lawsuit Against Impact Wrestling

    Anthem Sports and Entertainment filed a motion on Thursday to have Jeff Jarrett’s lawsuit against the company dismissed. Jarrett filed the lawsuit against the company in August.

    Jarrett’s suit claims Anthem “reproduced, distributed, publicly displayed, offered for sale, and sold the GFW Amped content without providing any compensation or royalties to GFE or Mr. Jarrett.” This stemming from the failed merger between Impact and Global Force Wrestling last year.

    Anthem’s response is that Jarrett himself was the one who authorized Anthem’s use of GFW content. They provided their own records of trademark filings as well as a non-disclosure agreement signed by Jarrett.

    “There can be no doubt that Jarrett provided the content at the request of Defendant Anthem Wrestling and that he intended that Anthem Wrestling use and distribute the content, using Plaintiffs’ trademarks,” Anthem’s response reads. “Moreover, because Plaintiff Jarrett granted this license in exchange for his salary and the promise of the anticipated merger, it is supported by consideration and is irrevocable.”

    In a nutshell, Anthem’s response is that Jarrett sold his content in exchange for a salary and job.

    “As often happens, the parties’ merger plans did not work out as expected,” Anthem’s response continued. “Mr. Jarrett was terminated near the end of October 2017. The sale and marketing of the Amped Content was not successful and did not turn a profit.”



    BOW DOWN TO THE KING

    ***GAME OVER!***


  2. #2
    Kal Ho Na Ho,C'est La Vie Will's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Posts
    5,344
    Rep Power
    189

    Default

    I really dont understand how JJ thinks he has a case.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •