I am wondering if someone can explain to me why Edge wasn't disqualified when Lita came in the ring. When Sharmele came in the ring 2 matches earlier, Booker T was disqualified.
Since they made a huge deal about Edge losing if he was disqualified and IMO, Lita coming in the ring and hopping on top of Cena and Edge deserves a disqualification, why wasn't he?
Another great move by the Bookers in power
Results 1 to 10 of 17
-
08-21-2006, 12:20 PM #1UOW's Senior Citizen
- Join Date
- Dec 2005
- Location
- Jungle!
- Posts
- 27,676
- Rep Power
- 5458
Why wasn't Edge disqualified earlier in match???
-
08-21-2006, 01:07 PM #2The King of Kings
- Join Date
- May 2006
- Location
- Roselle, Illinois
- Posts
- 145
- Rep Power
- 22
I think its because Lita never touched Cena and the Ref just let it roll, Sharmell actually attacked Batista
^GREATEST DAY OF MY LIFE^
-
08-21-2006, 02:19 PM #3UOW's Senior Citizen
- Join Date
- Dec 2005
- Location
- Jungle!
- Posts
- 27,676
- Rep Power
- 5458
She did stop Edge from being FUed by Cena and that could have changed the match, so she did interfere in the match.
-
08-21-2006, 03:07 PM #4End Of All Things To Come
- Join Date
- Jun 2006
- Location
- Wisconsin
- Posts
- 2,717
- Rep Power
- 170
She did interfere but the WWE does do stupid stuff sometimes and this is one of them. I actually thought the WWE was going to have Cena win but I guess not.
RIP JC
-
08-21-2006, 03:08 PM #5Ring Crew
- Join Date
- Aug 2006
- Posts
- 6
- Rep Power
- 0
lion, it's just as you said...
Originally Posted by lionden
-
08-21-2006, 03:10 PM #6Screwed up in a HOSTEL
- Join Date
- Jun 2006
- Location
- Where everyone does
- Posts
- 2,487
- Rep Power
- 122
storylines dude.
[IMG]
[/IMG]
-
08-21-2006, 03:16 PM #7End Of All Things To Come
- Join Date
- Jun 2006
- Location
- Wisconsin
- Posts
- 2,717
- Rep Power
- 170
Originally Posted by the phenomenal sid
Well we all know it is a storyline but the way it was done is just stupid and the bookers of the WWE are stupid and do stupid shit. I still think all champioship matches should be no DQ.
RIP JC
-
08-21-2006, 04:09 PM #8Ring Crew
- Join Date
- Jan 2006
- Posts
- 8
- Rep Power
- 0
the bookers of wwe should ban diva's such as lita and sharmell from all world title matches from the ring area !!!
-
08-21-2006, 04:15 PM #9End Of All Things To Come
- Join Date
- Jun 2006
- Location
- Wisconsin
- Posts
- 2,717
- Rep Power
- 170
^ No they should make the matches no DQ. I myself like the Divas at ring side and it would be pointless to have them as a secound if they can't come to the ring. Plus who doesn't want to look at some fine ass.
RIP JC
-
08-22-2006, 12:59 AM #10UOW's Senior Citizen
- Join Date
- Dec 2005
- Location
- Jungle!
- Posts
- 27,676
- Rep Power
- 5458
I looked aorund for actual DQ rules and most usually say the same thing:
Offenses punishable by disqualification (or "DQ") include:
- Any outside interference involving a person not involved in the match striking or holding a wrestler. If someone attempts to interfere but is ejected from the ring by a wrestler or referee before this occurs, there is usually no disqualification.
Now, with this, it is stupid since what she did could have and did change the match completely. Anyway, it is the WWE although technically, you could say she is touching him lol.
Reply With Quote
