Undertaker's contract - WH champ still plausible at WM 23?

[Abhishek_Divekar]

I read on a site that Undertaker's contract expires May 2007. If Undertaker and Batista match does occur at WM 23 as speculated, it may result in these possibilities:

1) Undertaker jobs to Batista and loses his WM streak. Then he retires in May.

2) Undertaker wins the title, but then loses it either on Smackdown or Judgement Day.

3) Undertaker wins the title, then forfeits it because he is retiring, causing a vacated title.

4) Batista DQ's himself and retains the title, while Undertaker keeps his WM streak.


Thoughts?

[BXtremeJ]

1) Undertaker jobs to Batista and loses his WM streak. Then he retires in May. Never Going To Happen

2) Undertaker wins the title, but then loses it either on Smackdown or Judgement Day. I Could See This Happening

3) Undertaker wins the title, then forfeits it because he is retiring, causing a vacated title. This Would Be Nice To See

4) Batista DQ's himself and retains the title, while Undertaker keeps his WM streak. WWE's Way Of Solving It

[Ma[N]KinD]

Ya id have to Agree with Number 4. I mean I cant See this Happening in Wrestlemania because i can see John Cena Vs Batista. Or Batista vs A New Superstar . Anywyze. Yes the Choice 4 is the way of WWE Solving it which will make it Plain Simple and obvious to watch.

[neXus]

If its undertaker vs Batista, someone will have to make a heel turn. It will most likely be Taker. I see Big Evil coming back, but I think the match would be boring unless it has a really good story behind it. Also there is no way Undertaker should lose his wrestlemaina streak.

[mad_54321]

I agree...I would hate for UT to give up his streak...especially to Batista!
I mean, if it were someone better, cool, but since Batista isn't even in Taker's league and Taker has been a real pro since joining WWE I would love to see him retire with the belt...Won't happen though.