Welcome to Universe of Wrestling Forums! Established in 2006!

Universe of Wrestling's 20th anniversary is next year and many changes are coming.
Universe of Wrestling is going through a transitional phase right now in 2025.

To become a UOW member, please *Click Here* to register. Quick and easy.

Benefits of becoming a member include:
- You lose this welcome at the top of the screen every page.
- You can do a lot more on forums than social media sites.
- Chat in real time, in our chat box.
- See what members are online.
- Friendly members and staff.
- More benefits coming soon.


Due to the transitional phase, if you get any type of Error Page.
Just refresh the page or click the browser back button or load UOW again.
We apologize for any trouble you may have on the forum during this time.

If you have any questions or need help, please message us on our Facebook page. Click below.
https://www.facebook.com/UniverseOfWrestling/

Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 123 LastLast
Results 11 to 20 of 26
  1. #11
    Ring Crew Rated R Phenom's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    Minneapolis, MN
    Posts
    13
    Rep Power
    19

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by TNAisWrestling View Post
    What a fucking bias opinion
    Yeah, biased. Hi pot, meet kettle.

    Name one aspect of that that had any semblance of bias to it. I called it like I saw it. If you think that airing a fucking Best Of is a better move than pulling out a Class-A show with ALL that TNA is, then you are the one who is biased.
    Last edited by Rated R Phenom; 02-15-2007 at 12:31 AM.

  2. #12
    Ring Crew Rated R Phenom's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    Minneapolis, MN
    Posts
    13
    Rep Power
    19

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by TNAisWrestling View Post
    I am quite happy that this thread was submitted because that means all that advertisment paid off and some WWE fans got to see some of the stuff TNA has to offer. I hope now some of those die hard WWE can now witness the best of both worlds.
    The show got a lower rating than Impact does, so how did anything "pay off?"

  3. #13
    On the bench!
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Posts
    21
    Rep Power
    0

    Default

    According to reports, the feeling internally within TNA right now about the Monday night "This is TNA!" special is that the show scored a solid rating seeing as it was 115% higher in viewership than the normal show in that timeslot. The show was also No. 3 that night among ad-supported cable network programming in the important male 18-49 and 25-34 demographics.

    Despite the improvement in that timeslot, the number still has to be looked at as a slight disappointment considering the huge WWE audience that was without wrestling that night. However, some see the slight increase to 1.2 as a possible sign of things to come if ratings for iMPACT! on Thursday finally start to bump up from the 1.1 range.
    Last edited by TNAisWrestling; 02-15-2007 at 01:11 AM.

  4. #14
    **Incorporated Filmix** Dangerous Incorporated's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Posts
    2,547
    Rep Power
    104

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by TNAisWrestling View Post
    According to reports, the feeling internally within TNA right now about the Monday night "This is TNA!" special is that the show scored a solid rating seeing as it was 115% higher in viewership than the normal show in that timeslot. The show was also No. 3 that night among ad-supported cable network programming in the important male 18-49 and 25-34 demographics.

    Despite the improvement in that timeslot, the number still has to be looked at as a slight disappointment considering the huge WWE audience that was without wrestling that night. However, some see the slight increase to 1.2 as a possible sign of things to come if ratings for iMPACT! on Thursday finally start to bump up from the 1.1 range.
    First of all you need to quote your source for your comments.

    There rating was about the same in average really a "possible sign of things to come" is just some TNA mark making up stuff.

    1958 - 2009
    R.I.P.


  5. #15
    On the bench!
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Posts
    21
    Rep Power
    0

    Default

    thats coming from an undertaker mark, people love to hate me and I find it quite entertaining to tell you the truth
    Last edited by TNAisWrestling; 02-15-2007 at 02:38 AM.

  6. #16
    On the bench!
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    Toronto Canada
    Posts
    582
    Rep Power
    0

    Default

    ^ I have yet to see one person show any love for you. I think people dont like you period. You are a mark and a close minded mark at that. TNA got an average rating at best considering WWE fans in America couldnt see it at their normal time slot. Im sure that many Canadian fans like myself switched when WWE came on at its normal time considering TNA was nothing more than replays. If your a true fan of TNA you would have already seen just about every match they showed on that night.

    The "HUGE"[] new match concept they had was the same shit different name. The whole reason for the steel X instead of the original cable is so that you can see moves like the Stylesclash from 12 feet in the air. Its nothing special. I feel like once youve seen 1 highflying match youve just about seen them all.

    TNA likes to say they are wrestling, they like to try and wage a war against WWE, but since they started their so called war their product has been a WWE rip off at best. They shoot more promos, they have more storylines and they have put most of their focus on their main title.
    Last edited by neXus; 02-15-2007 at 04:53 AM.

  7. #17
    On the bench!
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Posts
    21
    Rep Power
    0

    Default

    1. I agree the new concept is crap.
    2. I have seen those matches and that proves i am a true fan
    3. BLAME RUSSO

  8. #18
    **Incorporated Filmix** Dangerous Incorporated's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Posts
    2,547
    Rep Power
    104

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by TNAisWrestling View Post
    thats coming from an undertaker mark, people love to hate me and I find it quite entertaining to tell you the truth

    Being an Undertaker mark has nothing to do with it. I just disagree o your comments. I dont hate you. I dont even know you.

    Bottom line is TNA dropped the ball on this ample opportunity. And the ratings show it.

    1958 - 2009
    R.I.P.


  9. #19
    Ring Crew Rated R Phenom's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    Minneapolis, MN
    Posts
    13
    Rep Power
    19

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by PW Torch
    The "This is TNA!" special on Spike TV last night drew a disappointing 1.18 rating and 1.5 million viewers, short of what last week's regular edition of Impact drew.
    So, it got a 115% higher rating than what? What would Spike TV usually air then? A Buffy rerun? Nobody ever watches Spike TV any-damn-ways unless it's wrestling or UFC.

    Somebody is trying to put an awful lot of makeup on this pig.

  10. #20
    On the bench!
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    12
    Rep Power
    0

    Default

    i guess most 'wrestling fans' would rather watch cena and vito make love to each other -sigh-

Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 123 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •