Breaking News: WWE Releases Ashley Massaro

[Ill Will]

its not really breaking news when it happened a few weeks ago

She announced that she asked for a release a few weeks ago. The release was just granted last week.

Once again, I would like to point out Cena vs Triple H (1 and 2), Cena vs HBK (1 and 2), and all of the Cena vs Edge's, Cena vs Randy Ortons, and even Cena vs Bobby Lashley as reasons why Cena CAN indeed wrestle, contrary to what some know it all internet fans think.

lol, do you know what your list of matches proves? Absolutely nothing. Those are examples of when you thought Cena was good. They are reasons why you think Cena "CAN indeed wrestle". For someone who disagrees and thinks those matches suck, those reasons all amount to shit.

Anyway, the rest of your posts in this thread have show that immaturity and homerism always take precedence over logic. The only thing any of your posts have proven is the theory that people will defend the wrestlers they like without regard to rationality, reason, or common sense, not to mention resorting to insults due to the lack of an intelligent argument.

[tommy]

She announced that she asked for a release a few weeks ago. The release was just granted last week.


lol, do you know what your list of matches proves? Absolutely nothing. Those are examples of when you thought Cena was good. They are reasons why you think Cena "CAN indeed wrestle". For someone who disagrees and thinks those matches suck, those reasons all amount to shit.

Anyway, the rest of your posts in this thread have show that immaturity and homerism always take precedence over logic. The only thing any of your posts have proven is the theory that people will defend the wrestlers they like without regard to rationality, reason, or common sense, not to mention resorting to insults due to the lack of an intelligent argument.

You obviously didn't read these posts very carefully, as I didn't "resort to insults due to the lack of an intelligent arguement". I was insulted first. As for your comments on Cena, he has proven himself as I stated. Just because some of his haters are extremely stubborn doesn't mean that those reasons amount to nothing. It just means that those people are extremely stubborn.

[Ill Will]

You obviously didn't read these posts very carefully, as I didn't "resort to insults due to the lack of an intelligent arguement". I was insulted first.

Bull. Fucking. Shit.

You called coachthor stupid before he had even made a post addressed at you. His first post was about Ashley being fired because she was an ugly hooker, and you responded to that by calling him stupid.

To deny this would be to argue against facts. The original posts are still there.

As for your comments on Cena, he has proven himself as I stated.

lol, he has proven himself to you. Just because you "stated" it doesn't mean that your perspective is the only one. As I said, people can obviously disagree that Cena can wrestle, and they can disagree with your examples of when he performed well. It's called having an opinion, and yours isn't any more valid than anyone else's.

Just because some of his haters are extremely stubborn doesn't mean that those reasons amount to nothing. It just means that those people are extremely stubborn.

This is probably one of the most hypocritical statements I've read on this forum. You're blind homerism is getting quite sad. People disagreeing with you doesn't make them stubborn. The irony here of course is that you consistently think the same thing about Cena as well. If Cena haters are stubborn simply because stand by their opinion after you've listed your useless examples, then through your logic, Cena fanboys such as yourself have to be just as stubborn, because obviously you haven't changed your mind either.

Furthermore, the reason your reasons amount to nothing is because you're basically backing up your opinion with more opinions. If someone says Cena can't wrestle, you should assume that they've already seen what he can do in the ring, otherwise they wouldn't be judging him. But even if they hadn't, simply listing matches where you thought he was good is a fallacy because it doesn't actually prove anything. People can obviously disagree with you on each individual match as well. And once again, that's not being stubborn.