The streak

[The Mac]

kane is most deserving
but edge or orton both r worthy to
and ya if cena beats him i wont watch wwe again

[Travicity]

What's wrong with Cena beating him?

[The Mac]

he doesnt deserve it

[Smartmark]

What's wrong with Cena beating him?

You know what's wrong with that Travis. Don't try to me a smartass!

[Travicity]

^ Ok but Orton I wouldnt mind.

[The Mac]

he's young enough that this would make his career
but has done enough in wwe that he has the respect needed
to be thought of to win

[Travicity]

Yes but it would have to be built up great though and try and make Orton a worthy contender to beat him

[The Mac]

ya and they have time to build him up... give him a title reign
then maybe have him attack kane and put him out to piss off taker
and then taker does his usual mindgames up till wrestlemania
maybe even bring paul bearer back for orton to pound on

[TJChurch]

As I said before, I think it should be somebody younger, which rules-out the mainly-discussed 3 of Orton, Cena, & Edge... Not to mention that I've already seen plenty of Edge-Taker (Seems every time Edge returns except 2010) & Orton-Taker (around the Legend Killer gimmick time).

I disagree with the idea on the first page of this thread with the problem being Kane wrestles more than Taker, & yet UT wins so many Titles. I think the fact that he wrestles more is why they give UT as many belts/shots, so his few matches mean more. (That being said, I am among the at-the-time-seemingly-few who liked the biker character, though I don't think going back to it now would do anything positive for his character.)

I would like to see UT retire soon (should've by now), & I've said elsewhere online) I think ending the streak would be a good reason (psychologically?) for him to stop... So it should be done soon. But who, as with anything for Kane now, would depend not just on good numbers, etc for age & talent, but the storyline/feud they could book leading into it.

[The Mac]

i think orton and edge r both young enough to win it
you dont want someone wih little experience to win
that being said kane is the best choice as i feel that having
someone win on his third attempt would further prove how hard it is to beat taker
instead of having a young guy beat him on his first attempt that would mean that
wrestler is better then shawn and everyone else on takers list and i see no one who fits that catagory