What is "better"?
As for putting on a show, it's equal because different (entertainer, outspoken, selling, ego-mentality vs. badass, destroyer, evil, for himself mentality)...
You can look at it either way imo
CM Punk
Brock Lesnar
What is "better"?
As for putting on a show, it's equal because different (entertainer, outspoken, selling, ego-mentality vs. badass, destroyer, evil, for himself mentality)...
You can look at it either way imo
Of course Lesnar draws more money than Punk right now, simply because you'll see Lesnar 3 times a year...
Punk's great in the title scenario (champ or chasing), now he's got to prove to steal the show as co-main eventer without going for the title after being the top dog last year - if he manages to do so, his status as No.1 guy is cemented
Last edited by muzi; 06-23-2013 at 03:03 PM.
Definitely it has to be Brock Lesnar.
Brock Lesnar gives that level of intensity and generates excitement other wrestlers lacks.
When Brock walks in a ring, the expectation is somebody is gonna to get his ass kick.
when punk shows up, people just switch to another channel.
It would be great to see a Brock vs CM Punk match to see who is the better man.
Last edited by icered; 06-24-2013 at 10:39 AM.
Well Punk is the better talker and entertainer, but as for bringing genuine intimidation I've got to go with Lesnar. He is a beast, and I really look forward to his matches. I think, as for now, WWE is handling him correctly. I just hope they don't screw it up. IMO, they blew Punk. He switched from bad guy to good guy now bad guy to often to settle into either. I think Punk is kind of small, which makes it a little difficult to take him seriously against someone like Lesnar.