ould the WWE be better with less PPVs?

[XXKSXX]

I do think that the WWE has to many PPV's. They should scale back a bit but they wont they make lots of money from them. Havening so many PPV's makes things on TV have to move faster. Like short feuds and not as much hippe for the PPV witch makes the PPV not as special is they were say 5 or 6 years ago.

[wwe9112]

I think they should only have one every 2 or so months because the feuds will be better and not go by so fast.

[Platinum_Lies]

I think they should only have one every 2 or so months because the feuds will be better and not go by so fast.

And the fact that the big titles might just change at non-PPV shows would help the overall product. Hell, I only watch about 7 PPV's during the year anyway.

[bigdaddybaughman]

the ppv sistuation can be blamed on Eric Bishoff and the manday night wars. he thought of going to 10 a year then made it 12 to out do Vince. with the money they were making that just became the standerd. it wont change until the bottom line changes and they dont sell out. then Vince will consider changing things. Vince only changes when made to by compation.

[BigAl147]

Lets be honest, the number of PPV's isnt going to drop when they're making money off them. Storyline wise it would be good to have only 4 or 5 a year to avoid repitiition of matches and angles; thing is if more titles changed on Raw, Smackdown! or ECW why would people pay to see the PPV's where the same thngs would be happening?

[Garden State Saint]

Less PPVs wouldn't hurt WWE but it shows more in TNA I think. ECW had the right equation.

[wm22champ]

i think that over time wwe is actually gonna only air the big 4 on PPV and the rest are somehow gonna gradually go to being broadcast on WWE.COM