ould the WWE be better with less PPVs?

[bad_meetz_evil]

Think 3 brands. TNA is only one brand and they also have 12 PPV a month. But it'll never go down as it used to be 10 something years ago. As long as their making profits, their no need to rethink the number of PPVs.

[Platinum_Lies]

Think 3 brands. TNA is only one brand and they also have 12 PPV a month. But it'll never go down as it used to be 10 something years ago. As long as their making profits, their no need to rethink the number of PPVs.

The problem is that most of the non-Big 4 are continually losing buys from year to year. At some point in the next few years it will no longer be profitable and they will have to shave PPVs off anyway. They should just start now.

[Garden State Saint]

Less PPVs wouldn't hurt WWE but it shows more in TNA I think. ECW had the right equation.