Kurt who?

[tommy]

The WWE put up a story about all the drafts throughout the years, and there is someone missing from the 2006 story.

2006 – Let’s get extreme
In 2006, the Draft Lottery was not held; instead, Paul Heyman got to select one Superstar from both Raw and SmackDown to fill out the roster of the revived ECW brand. Heyman used his brilliant tactical mind and chose ECW Original Rob Van Dam (one of the backbones of ECW in the 1990s), who just weeks later went on to become the first man to simultaneously hold both the WWE and ECW Championships.

Now, if they are going to mention that he got two picks, why on earth wouldn't they mention who both picks were? I mean, just say that he only picked RVD if you are going to choose to ignore Angle.

More and more, the WWE is starting to ignore former wrestlers, expecially ones that have gone to TNA. It's starting to get rediculous though. I mean, at this point I wouldn't be shocked if in "The History of the WWE Championship, part 2" came out and people like Kurt Angle and the Ultimate Warrior weren't even listed as former champions.

Is this starting to get redicoulous to anyone else? What other instances like this have you been seeing show up everywhere?

[bad_meetz_evil]

It's just a technique for them not to loose fans. I hate to see it happen, but it happens.

[Role Model]

It's get stupid. It seems they only want to mention former wrestlers who are in good standing with the WWE.

[Kage]

Well WWE is at a disadvantage in this way with the whole can't say anything about TNA or it's wrestlers. I mean every TNA fan out there knows about WWE so they can say stuff like "Team 3D are former WWE Tag Team Champions". But not all WWE fans know about TNA so WWE can't say anything about TNA or they might lose a few fans.