I think that MVP should have been given the title, He is a top heel and I think will soon be World Champ.
Results 1 to 10 of 17
-
07-28-2007, 06:57 PM #1Lord of the Ring
- Join Date
- Jan 2007
- Location
- At the World's End
- Posts
- 2,217
- Rep Power
- 105
Who should of won the WHC instead of Khali?
-
07-28-2007, 07:02 PM #2I'm back
- Join Date
- Aug 2006
- Location
- Sacramento, California
- Posts
- 1,931
- Rep Power
- 130
MVP is the US champ, they wouldnt give him the WHC too.. It should of gone to Matt Hardy IMO
[Today 08:48 PM] Crossfire: pimping aint easy but its necessary, but Josh is chasing hoes like Tom chases Jerry
-
07-28-2007, 07:16 PM #3Main Eventer
- Join Date
- Jun 2007
- Posts
- 40,726
- Rep Power
- 741
I say Kane should have gotten it... Khali can't wrestle and Batista has had it too long and can barely wrestle too and Kane was getting main event status with Edge.
.
-
07-28-2007, 07:24 PM #4Danger zone
- Join Date
- Apr 2006
- Posts
- 4,669
- Rep Power
- 680
i agree that kane should have had it only because he was the number 1 contender a week before Edge got in juried. he should have kept the tittle and then feuded with Edge when he came back
gfx credit: Role Model
"The best in the world" Andre Jones
Triple Crown Winner
2x LOW Heavyweight Champion
2x Mr. Money in the Bank
2013 Superstar of the Year
1X Universal Champion
1X LOW Tag Team Champion
42-18-2 1-NC
Ashley Lane
1X Women's Champion
6-4-1
-
07-28-2007, 08:19 PM #5Main Eventer
- Join Date
- Jun 2007
- Posts
- 40,726
- Rep Power
- 741
They could now use this in a huge manner. Have Kane get the belt eventually from Khali/Batista and then have Edge and Undertaker feud over the belt because Undertaker left because of Edge and is Undertaker's 'brother' and Edge left because of Kane who is 'brother' to Undertaker whom Edge stole the belt from... That would be an awesome feud...
.
-
07-28-2007, 08:45 PM #6I'm back
- Join Date
- Aug 2006
- Location
- Sacramento, California
- Posts
- 1,931
- Rep Power
- 130
WTF did you just say Eel
[Today 08:48 PM] Crossfire: pimping aint easy but its necessary, but Josh is chasing hoes like Tom chases Jerry
-
07-28-2007, 09:48 PM #7Main Eventer
- Join Date
- Jun 2007
- Posts
- 40,726
- Rep Power
- 741
LOL. I mean Undertaker would hate Edge for 'putting' him out and Taker is related to Kane. And Kane put Edge out and as Kane's Taker's brother, Kane could then be working for Undertaker or some crazy story like that...
.
-
07-28-2007, 10:35 PM #8RED DEVIL
- Join Date
- Jan 2006
- Location
- My Yard
- Posts
- 2,089
- Rep Power
- 339
Well I honestly think the WWE screwed this one big time. Kane has always had support for him, even more so lately. He could have a nice decent length run, and the fans would be behind him 100%. Now if they would have had him win the Battle Royal, then he could be the champion for at least two days, going by the broadcast schedule. It just pisses me off when they build him up and possible give him a chance to be World Champion, then screw him over because Edge gets injured. Its a load of crap and a mistake. All McMahon cares about is having the biggest, meanest guy hold the title, and nothing else. Does he even know how many fans Kane has? Its a big mistake and I hope he regrets it with the not-so-Great Khali as champ.
-
07-28-2007, 10:51 PM #9End Of All Things To Come
- Join Date
- Jun 2006
- Location
- Wisconsin
- Posts
- 2,717
- Rep Power
- 170
Kahli is actually fine he is a good heel not a god wrestler but a good heel. If I had my choice it would have been Kane or Mark Henry.
RIP JC
-
07-29-2007, 01:21 AM #10Main Eventer
- Join Date
- Jun 2007
- Posts
- 40,726
- Rep Power
- 741
I say, let Kane be thrown into the mix again and have it a triple threat Hell in a Cell with Khali,Batista and Kane and have Kane win there. Then put Khali into a feud with the 'King of the Jungle' and have Batista and Rey team up to liven up the tag division...
.
Reply With Quote
