I think wwe lacks the tailent. People like watchin bobby, batista, kenndy, cena
but they would enjoy more watchin HHH, Y2J, Angle performing.
WWE should think of some thing new they should stop repeating the things that took place in the attitude era.
They should bring their big gunnnnnns back to the action.
Ur comments...
Results 1 to 10 of 16
Thread: Lack of superstars..?
-
03-14-2007, 05:04 PM #1Owner
- Join Date
- Jun 2006
- Posts
- 304
- Rep Power
- 53
Lack of superstars..?
-
03-14-2007, 05:16 PM #2On the bench!
- Join Date
- Jan 2007
- Location
- Holland
- Posts
- 1,596
- Rep Power
- 0
It's not the lack of superstars, it's who's getting pushes and not. WWE = all about favouring and sucking up to McMahon apperently...
-
03-14-2007, 07:57 PM #3End Of All Things To Come
- Join Date
- Jun 2006
- Location
- Wisconsin
- Posts
- 2,717
- Rep Power
- 170
Lot of the older wrestlers have other things going on or they are injured where they can't wrestle and besides wrestling is about evolution. Wrestling wouldn't be any different if they were in the WWE because it's the same people running things.
RIP JC
-
03-14-2007, 08:16 PM #4Jobber
- Join Date
- Mar 2007
- Posts
- 53
- Rep Power
- 20
Honestly there are a ton of superstars, I say bring the brands together, cancel ECW..fire everyone thats not normally used, and only have the WWE, Intercontinental and Tag tittles..maybe Cruiserweight too but make the cut off line for that 235 pounds
-
03-14-2007, 08:19 PM #5End Of All Things To Come
- Join Date
- Jun 2006
- Location
- Wisconsin
- Posts
- 2,717
- Rep Power
- 170
^ I don't think ECW should be canceled it has gotten alot better and Dusty has shaken things up a bit on the show. But I do agree the WWE has lots of stars right now.
RIP JC
-
03-14-2007, 08:24 PM #6Jobber
- Join Date
- Mar 2007
- Posts
- 53
- Rep Power
- 20
^^
Yes but the problem is the ECW name, it angers and turns off alot of fans that they arn't ECW but rather WWECW..especially the whole DQ rule (which is bs because it doesn't mean every match has to be hardcore..it just means theres more room to wrestle different styles)
Also, there is the fact that it's terribly hard to run 3 shows a week. They have enough trouble with 2, 3 is crazy.. and the whole network problem too..thats why I say combine the rosters and leave it at 2 shows.
-
03-14-2007, 08:35 PM #7End Of All Things To Come
- Join Date
- Jun 2006
- Location
- Wisconsin
- Posts
- 2,717
- Rep Power
- 170
I do wish they would change the name of the ECW brand as I have stated before in other ECW threads. But I think the WWE does very well with 3 shows. I happen to like it. They have to many good wrestlers that they don't want to let go also cause they will go work for the other company if they get fired and make TNA better and Vince isn't about to do that.
RIP JC
-
03-14-2007, 08:36 PM #8Jobber
- Join Date
- Mar 2007
- Posts
- 53
- Rep Power
- 20
^^
Just cancle the brand and bring all the talent to other rosters then
-
03-15-2007, 12:25 AM #9Mid-carder
- Join Date
- Mar 2007
- Location
- CALIFORNIA
- Posts
- 260
- Rep Power
- 26
Originally Posted by GKY
They should get rid of Smackdown not ECW and keep ECW seperate from RAW. No more wrestlers jumping back and forth just make them two distinct seperate brands.
-
03-15-2007, 12:35 AM #10On the bench!
- Join Date
- Jan 2007
- Location
- Holland
- Posts
- 1,596
- Rep Power
- 0
Lashley is indeed the big thing right now, getting mad push. Except his mic skill sucks (i.e. Vince apologizing segment) and his finisher is ... hmm . .. mediocre to say the least... ANYHOWS that just proofs that it doesn't mean jack if you're the best wrestler if you don't suck up to Vince (I doubt CM Punk does, lol) but yeah... oh well... WWE is funny like that.
Reply With Quote
